Close

Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science - An open access, peer reviewed international journal covering all aspects of Nutrition and Food Science

lock and key

Sign in to your account.

Account Login

Forgot your password?

Home » Consequential Effect of Gluten-Free Diet on Health-Related Quality of Life in Celiac Populace-A Meta-Analysis

Consequential Effect of Gluten-Free Diet on Health-Related Quality of Life in Celiac Populace-A Meta-Analysis

Shivani Rustagi1, Saumya Choudhary2,3, Sheeba Khan4and Tanu Jain1*

1Amity Institute of Food Technology, Amity University, Noida, India.

2Biomedical Informatics Centre, National Institute of Pathology, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.

3Department of Molecular and Cellular Engineering, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad, India.

4Department of Food Science, Warner College of Dairy Technology, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad, India.

Corresponding Author Email: tjain2@amity.edu

DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CRNFSJ.8.3.29

Article Publishing History

Received: 14/5/2020

Accepted: 24/9/2020

Plagiarism Check: Yes

Reviewed by: Dr.Sebnem Harsa Nepal

Second Review by: Dr.Kirti Jalgaonkar India

Final Approval by: Prof. Rajesh Jeewon

Article Metrics

Views  

PDF Download  PDF Downloads: 977
Abstract:

Globally, celiac disease (CD) affects around 1-2% of the population. Gluten elimination becomes the cornerstone treatment and is also being followed by non-celiac as a healthy dietary habit. However, there is lack of sustainable evidence to understand this view. Adherence to gluten-free diet (GFD) rendered a few to reduced quality of life. Hence, a meta-analysis has been performed to determine interaction of GFD and Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL). NCBI/MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and Science Direct were combed from date of inception to October 30, 2018 for studies assessing the effect of GFD using validated questionnaires on HRQoL a) between healthy controls and celiac patients b) dietary adherence to GFD in celiac subjects. Random effect model was used for meta-analysis. Twenty-five studies comprising 5148 CD subjects fit in the inclusion criteria. GFD had moderate significant association with HRQoL, for PGWB odds ratio’s (OR) 0.613 [95% CI, 0.449-0.837], SF-36 Mental Component Score (MCS) 0.026 [95% CI, 0.011-0.060], Physical Component Score (PCS) 0.066 95% [CI, 0.032-0.138]. Partial adherence to GFD had lower quality of life when compared to strictly adherent patients for OR’s SF-36 MCS 5.080 [95% CI, 1.885- 13.692], PCS 3.204 [95% CI, 1.579- 6.503] and CDQoL 2.439 [95%CI (1.724- 3.450)]. The results implied moderate significant association between GFD and HRQoL and better compliance leads to favourable HRQoL.

Keywords:

Celiac Disease; Cdqol; Gluten-Free Diet; Health-Related Quality Of Life; PGWB, SF-36

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article:

Rustagi S, Choudhary S, Khan S, Jain T. Consequential Effect of Gluten-Free Diet on Health-Related Quality of Life in Celiac Populace-A Meta-Analysis . Curr Res Nutr Food Sci 2020; 8(3). doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CRNFSJ.8.3.29


Copy the following to cite this URL:

Rustagi S, Choudhary S, Khan S, Jain T. Consequential Effect of Gluten-Free Diet on Health-Related Quality of Life in Celiac Populace-A Meta-Analysis . Curr Res Nutr Food Sci 2020; 8(3). https://bit.ly/3m4AOqI

Introduction

Celiac Disease (CD) is an autoimmune inflammatory enteropathy affecting globally around 1-2% of individuals in which women are more susceptible as compared to men1, distinguished by continual gluten intake intolerance in genetically predisposed populace. The gene alleles HLA DQ2 and/or HLA DQ8 and the ingested gluten interaction in CD patients provoke an abnormal mucosal immune response causing villous atrophy. A complex interplay among specific genes, environmental factors and gluten is necessary for CD to develop as not everyone who is genetically predisposed will develop the disease.2 Of late, the world has awakened to the severity and complexities arising due to CD. Researchers have suggested that α-gliadin (component of gluten and rich in glutamine) is the main causative agent that leads to the immune response.2,3 Owning to its chronic nature, there are histological alterations in the small bowel leading to nutrient malabsorption, psychological stress, social and family tribulation, capital strain and restrictions on different life decisions.4,5 The dire consequences of these can be observed on the Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as well. The only treatment is life-long withdrawal of gluten and a fundamental and perpetual transformation in dietetic habits.

HRQoL measures the health impact on the quality of life of people. It is a multi-dimensional concept encompassing subjective evaluation of physical, psychological and social functioning as well individual’s well-being.6,7 Analysis of HRQoL helps to measure the burden a chronic disease like CD has and provides insights between HRQoL and risk factors. Different questionnaires such as SF-36, PWGB and CDQoL are means to evaluate and quantify HRQoL in CD patients. SF-36 and PGWB are generic questionnaires which measure the functional status and psychological well-being8. Specific disease-related questionnaires (CDQ and CDQoL) are developed and validated for CD patients.1,5 These questionnaires assess self-apprehended health-related welfare of the individuals. The dietary habits of celiac patients and adherence to gluten-free diet (GFD) are the main factors associated with HRQoL. Many studies have shown that complete and permanent exclusion of gluten helps to relieve the symptoms and has positive effect on HRQoL.9–11 However, it is not surprising that strict GFD may aggravate the complexities in the patient’s life and deters their quality of life. Various surveys conducted show that an extreme vigilant GFD leads to restrictive travelling, social boundaries, anxiety and fatigue.1,12

Thus, studying the HRQoL aspects of CD patients gives relevant knowledge about the disease’s impact and its outcome can help the different food disciplines and medical services to adapt with each another. With remarkable progress in the percentage of aware consumers and increasing demand for health foods, there is a need to stress on studies that will assist to identify and set public policies, strategic plans and food standards for gluten-free products. Besides being gluten-free, products need to influence celiac patients emotional and social fears and worries, relieve economic burden and thus, elevate their quality of life. Being a rapidly growing disease and new data emerging regularly, a meta-analysis evaluating the effect of GFD and degree of adherence to diet on HRQoL of celiac patients becomes consequential.

Methodology

The present systematic review and meta-analysis were governed as per the guidelines of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA).

Search Strategy

Varied databases including NCBI MEDLINE / PubMed, Cochrane library, google scholar and science direct were searched from their genesis until October 30, 2018 employing amalgamation of keywords: “celiac disease”, “coeliac disease/therapy”, “diet, gluten-free”, “glutens”, “quality of life”, “questionnaires” and “well-being” without any language preferences. The search was further extended with following terms: coeliac sprue, gluten sensitive enteropathy, health-related quality of life and HRQoL. The full search phrases are presented in Table 1. In addition, bibliographies were explored from the included papers to identify additional eligible articles.

Table 1: Keywords Used for Identification of Articles for Inclusion in Meta- Analysis[1]

1.   “Celiac Disease”
2.   “Coeliac Disease/Therapy”
3.   Diet, Gluten-Free
4.   “Glutens”
5.   “Quality of Life”
6.   “Questionnaires”
7.   “Well-Being”
8.   (#1 And #2), (#1, #2 And #3), (#1, #2, #3 And #4), (#1, #2, #3, #4 And #5), (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5 And #6), (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 And #7), (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7 And #8)

Selection Criteria

This meta-analysis included studies with the following criteria (1) original research work; (2) assessed HRQoL using validated questionnaires; (3) confirmation of CD using tissue sample; (4) collate HRQoL in celiac as well normal populace, prior to and subsequent introduction of GFD or among subgroups. The exclusion criteria included (1) inference devoid of GFD or; (2) absence of full-length paper; (3) studies reported without control group. The studies evaluating HRQoL using disease specific Celiac Disease Quality of Life (CDQoL)13 or generic Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)14 and Psychological General Well- Being (PGWB) Index15 were included. The statistical summary of the included studies encompassed either mean score with standard deviation or standard error, confidence intervals or ranges, or median scores along with their ranges or interquartile ranges. Two reviewers (SR, SK) evaluated abstracts and disparities were rectified in concordance with other reviewers (SC, TJ).

Data Extraction

The included articles were rigorously examined. Extracted data included author’s names, year of publication, region, age, HRQoL assessment instruments along with number of celiac patients and healthy controls (Table 2a & 2b).

[1] The table 1 depicts the different keywords used to retrieve different search articles for

Table 2: (a) Characteristics of Studies Examining Impact of Gluten-Free Diet on Health-Related Quality of Life in Celiac Patients and Healthy Controls

S. No. Study Age Continent Case Patients Control Assessment Criteria
Case Control N Male Female N Male Female
1. Kivelä et al., 201816 NA 52 Europe 236 163 73 110 21 89 PGWB
2. Paarlahti et al., 201317 50 52.25 Europe 596 452 144 110 21 89 PGWB
3. Paavola et al., 201218 52.62 52.25 Europe 97 369 466 110 21 89 PGWB
4. Vilppula et al., 201119 62.5 NA Europe 35 15 20 110 21 89 PGWB
5. Ukkola et al., 201120 50.04 51.5 Europe 698 225 473 110 21 89 PGWB
6. Kurppa et al., 201021 45 49 Europe 73 58 15 110 21 89 PGWB
7. Roos et al., 200622 54.5 54.5 Europe 51 30 21 182 78 104 PGWB
8. Viljamaa et al., 200523 37.37 51.5 Europe 97 62 35 110 21 89 PGWB
9. Nunes-Silva et al., 201724 38 36.8 South America 15 12 3 15 12 3 SF-36
10. Paavola et al., 201218 52.62 49 Europe 466 97 369 2060 865 1195 SF- 36
11. Tontini et al., 201025 39 39 Europe 33 23 10 66 NA NA SF-36
12. Nachman et al., 201026 38 42 South America 53 5 48 70 15 55 SF-36
13. Nachman et al., 200927 38 42 South America 132 113 19 70 15 55 SF-36
14. Usai et al., 200728 38.7 38.4 Europe 129 101 28 526 126 400 SF-36
15. Hauser et al., 200629 49.25 47.7 Europe 346 100 446 2443 1085 1358 SF-36
16. Johnston et al., 200430 48.8 50.25 Europe 32 9 23 49 15 34 SF- 36
17. Fera et al., 200331 40.4 41 Europe 100 75 25 100 32 62 SF-36
18. Usai et al., 200232 46 47 Europe 54 15 68 136 28 112 SF-36

 

Table 2: (b) Characteristics of Studies Examining the Impact of Adherence to Gluten-Free Diet on Health-Related Quality of Life in Celiac Patients[1]

S. No. Study Age Continent Strict Adherence Partial Adherence Assessment Criteria
1. Zysk et al., 20184 36.75 Europe 185 66 CDQ
2. Pratesi et al., 20189 NA South America 399 51 CDQoL
3. Wolf et al., 20181 33.2 North America 19 61 CDQoL
4. Taghdir et al., 20165 11.3 Asia 35 30 CDDUX
5. Casellas et al., 20157 39.3 Europe 251 100 CDQoL
6. Aksan et al., 201511 31.1 Asia 143 62 CDQ
7. Nachman et al., 201026 38 South America 27 26 SF-36
8. Nachman et al., 200927 38 South America 59 25 SF-36
9. Hopman et al., 200933 40.83 Europe 33 20 SF-36
10. Usai et al., 200728 38.7 Europe 80 49 SF-36
11. Usai et al., 200232 46 Europe 39 27 SF-36

[1] The table 2a & 2b summarize the characteristics of the studies examining impact of gluten-free diet on health-related quality of life in celiac patients and healthy controls

Statistical Analysis

The mean and SD scores were obtained for CD patients and healthy controls along with measure for degree of adherance to GFD. Odds ratio and its 95% CI [UL, LL] has been used to sum up the difference of various identified parameters. The Z-score denoted the overall effect size obtained by odds ratio. The Z-score with a p ≤ 0.05 was statistically significant.

I2 statistics determined the heterogeneity across studies. To understand the cause of heterogeneity, a one-study remove sensitivity analysis was conducted.34,35 Funnel plot represented the publication bias. Comprehensive Meta-analysis Version 3.3.070, USA was used for the analyses.

Results

Literature Search

The literature search retrieved 286 related citations of which 44 articles were non-human models. Two hundred eleven articles were excluded due to different reasons discussed in Fig 1. Only 31 full text articles were screened for eligibility of which 25 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The included studies were from duration 2002 to 2018.

 Fig 1: Schematic representation of study selection process[1]

Figure 1: Schematic representation of study selection process[1]

Click here to View Figure

HRQoL of CD patients and healthy controls were determined using SF-36 and PGWB questionnaire. PGWB index revealed an overall life quality whereas SF-36 questionnaire threw distinct light on both emotional and physical aspect of quality of life among CD patients. Eight studies with 2252 CD patients and 952 healthy control using Psychological General Well- Being (PGWB) Index provided prospective data on HRQoL. From the forest plot (Fig 2), it is evident that gluten free diet has moderately affected the HRQoL with ORs[95%CI] 0.613 [0.449-0.837] with p=0.002 and moderate heterogeneity (I2) was reported i.e. 73.08%.

 Fig 2: Forest plot representing effect of Gluten Free Diet on HRQoL in CD Patients versus Non-celiac Controls using PGWB questionnaire[1]

Figure 2: Forest plot representing effect of Gluten Free Diet on HRQoL in CD Patients versus Non-celiac Controls using PGWB questionnaire.

Click here to View Figure

Similarly, Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) provided prospective data using ten studies with 1491 CD patients and 5517 non-celiac controls on HRQoL. SF-36 analyses both the physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS). From the ORs, it is can be stated that gluten free diet has not affected the HRQoL. The ORs [95%CI] of emotional quality and physical quality was found to be 0.066 [0.032-0.138] and 0.026 [0.011-0.060] with p<0.001 respectively showing non-significant effect on quality of life. High heterogeneity (I2) 77.85% was reported among both the parameters (Fig 3a & Fig 3b).

Fig 3: (A) Forest Plot Representing Effect of Gluten Free Diet on Hrqol (MCS) in CD Patients Versus Non-Celiac Controls Using SF-36 Questionnaire

Figure 3: (a) Forest Plot Representing Effect of Gluten Free Diet on Hrqol (MCS) in CD Patients Versus Non-Celiac Controls Using SF-36 Questionnaire.

Click here to View Figure

Effect of Dietary Adherence on Celiac Disease Patients

Based on eleven studies, in total 1852 patients, we found that HRQoL is significantly affected based on dietary adherence. The study analysed the effect of complete and partial adherence of GFD on CD patients. Six studies using CDQ, CD-QoL and CDDUX questionnaire with 1032 patients completely adhering to GFD and 370 partially adhering to GFD were analysed together. It has been reported that strict diet adherence has more significant impact on quality of life ORs (95% CI) 2.439 (1.724 – 3.450) with p = 0.004 and heterogeneity (I2) was reported to be 50.48% (Fig 4).  However, for SF-36 questionnaire strict diet adherence has more impact on emotional well-being as compared to physical well-being. The reported ORs (95% CI) of emotional well-being was 5.080 (1.885 – 13.692) with p-value 0.001 whereas the ORs (95% CI) of physical well-being was reported to be 3.204 (1.579-6.503) with p-value 0.001 and the heterogeneity (I2) was found to be 78%.

 Fig 4: Forest Plot Representing Effect Of Dietary Adherence On Hrqol Of Celiac Patients[1]

Figure 4: Forest Plot Representing Effect Of Dietary Adherence On Hrqol Of Celiac Patients[1]

Click here to View Figure

Publication Bias and Sensitivity Analysis

For different studies used, publication bias was separately evaluated. Funnel plot confirmed the biasness. The illustration of publication bias in PGWB questionnaire is given in Fig 5. Egger’s regression test confirmed the biasness between the studies (p < 0.05). The studies having greater average effects are published commonly leading to upward bias. Sensitivity analysis was done by omitting each study at a time without changing the overall statistical significance, thereby, establishing the stability and credibility of this meta-analysis.

Fig 5 Funnel Plot for PGWB Questionnaire Studies[1]

Figure 5: Funnel Plot for PGWB Questionnaire Studies[1]

Click here to View Figure

Discussion

The present study highlights the effect of GFD on HRQoL in CD as well in non-celiac healthy controls. Further, we studied the HRQoL in celiac populace while adhering to GFD.

The meta-analysis involved a total of 25 studies, 15037 healthy subjects and 5144 celiac patients. The effect of GFD in healthy versus CD patients in terms of their quality of life was compared using PGWB and SF-36 questionnaires. The results for both PGWB & SF-36 questionnaire indicates that gluten-free diet doesn’t have normalizing effect on HRQoL. Our results are in agreement with previous reports16,29,31 of GFD incompletely improving HRQoL in celiac populace. It can be attributed to the poor nutritional quality of the GF food products. They are generally high in fat and calories and deficient in important protein, vitamins, minerals, calcium and iron.36–38 Moreover, the poor nutritional status can be attributed to the malabsorption of nutrients owed to the anomalies of the small intestinal mucosa of the patients.39

Indeed, the GFD alleviates the symptoms and leads to mucosal healing in patients but the socioeconomic and emotional stress counter-weights these positive effects. The profound challenges the patients face emotionally as well as psychologically cause stress to the individuals thus, disturbing their social relationships; worsening the quality of life. Accordingly, following a GFD will lead to nutritional disturbances among celiac patients as well in normal populace.

Further to this, we assessed the impact of GFD adherence on HRQoL in celiac populace using CDQoL and PGWB questionnaires. It was found that strict adherence to GFD reduces the symptoms in CD subjects helps in normalizing their quality of life. Interestingly, significant difference was observed in the odds ratio between strict compliance versus partial or no compliance [CDQoL- 2-439. 95%CI (1.724- 3.450); SF- 36 MCS- 5.080, 95% CI (1.885- 13.692), PCS- 3.204, 95% CI (1.579- 6.503)]. Previous studies and meta-analysis have consistently found an association between poorer GFD adherence and low quality of life.4,6,7,9 Poor compliance to GFD can result in relapse of symptoms on consumption of gluten resulting in poorer quality of life.

A key importance of our study is that it bears clinical relevance. CD is a globally prevalent disease and our study indicates possible outcome of GFD on HRQoL. This outcome can aid the clinicians and researchers to devise strategic plans which will improve the quality of gluten-free foods, bear less economic and social stress on CD subjects thus ameliorate their quality of life. Additionally, we have compiled the maximum available evidence on HRQoL, thereby summarizing its current state. The study has its limitations, with lack of separately published sub-groups data it becomes difficult to interpret the effect various defining factors like gender, age, age of diagnosis on CD patients. Different risk factors that negatively affect the HRQoL needs to be further analysed.

Conclusion

GFD is a necessity for a small percentage while a choice for a wider group of people. It has become a health fad among the health enthusiasts. But further studies need to be conducted to analyse the nutritional benefits of it. In line with the present study, we can draw the conclusion that although GFD moderately improves but does not significantly harmonize the HRQoL in CD patients as compared to non-celiac. A strict compliance to the diet is an important determinant of HRQoL in CD patients. Designating a nutritionist for educating as well as support of family and friends can help to promote the quality of life.

Conflict of Interest

Authors have no conflict of interest.

Bibliography

  1. Wolf RL, Lebwohl B, Lee AR, et al. Hypervigilance to a Gluten-Free Diet and Decreased Quality of Life in Teenagers and Adults with Celiac Disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2018;63(6):1438-1448. doi:10.1007/s10620-018-4936-4
    CrossRef
  2. Serena G, Camhi S, Sturgeon C, Yan S, Fasano A. The Role of Gluten in Celiac Disease and Type 1 Diabetes. Nutrients. 2015;7(9):7143-7162. doi:10.3390/nu7095329
    CrossRef
  3. Meresse B, Ripoche J, Heyman M, Cerf-Bensussan N. Celiac disease: from oral tolerance to intestinal inflammation, autoimmunity and lymphomagenesis. Mucosal Immunol. 2009;2(1):8-23. doi:10.1038/mi.2008.75
    CrossRef
  4. Zysk W, Głąbska D, Guzek D. Social and Emotional Fears and Worries Influencing the Quality of Life of Female Celiac Disease Patients Following a Gluten-Free Diet. Nutrients. 2018;10(10):1414. doi:10.3390/nu10101414
    CrossRef
  5. Taghdir M, Honar N, Mazloomi SM, Sepandi M, Ashourpour M, Salehi M. Dietary compliance in Iranian children and adolescents with celiac disease. JMDH. 2016;Volume 9:365-370. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S110605
    CrossRef
  6. C D, Berry N, Vaiphei K, Dhaka N, Sinha SK, Kochhar R. Quality of life in celiac disease and the effect of gluten-free diet: Quality of life in celiac disease. JGH Open. 2018;2(4):124-128. doi:10.1002/jgh3.12056
    CrossRef
  7. Casellas F, Rodrigo L, Lucendo AJ, et al. Benefit on health-related quality of life of adherence to gluten-free diet in adult patients with celiac disease. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2015;107(4):196-201.
  8. Pekki H, Kurppa K, Mäki M, et al. Performing routine follow-up biopsy 1 year after diagnosis does not affect long-term outcomes in coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45(11):1459-1468. doi:10.1111/apt.14048
    CrossRef
  9. Pratesi C, Häuser W, Uenishi R, et al. Quality of Life of Celiac Patients in Brazil: Questionnaire Translation, Cultural Adaptation and Validation. Nutrients. 2018;10(9):1167. doi:10.3390/nu10091167
    CrossRef
  10. Burger JPW, de Brouwer B, IntHout J, Wahab PJ, Tummers M, Drenth JPH. Systematic review with meta-analysis: Dietary adherence influences normalization of health-related quality of life in coeliac disease. Clinical Nutrition. 2017;36(2):399-406. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.04.021
    CrossRef
  11. Aksan A, Mercanlıgil SM, Häuser W, Karaismailoğlu E. Validation of the Turkish version of the Celiac Disease Questionnaire (CDQ). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13(1):82. doi:10.1186/s12955-015-0272-y
    CrossRef
  12. Smith MM, Goodfellow L. The Relationship Between Quality of Life and Coping Strategies of Adults With Celiac Disease Adhering to a Gluten-Free Diet: Gastroenterology Nursing. 2011;34(6):460-468. doi:10.1097/SGA.0b013e318237d201
    CrossRef
  13. Dorn SD, Hernandez L, Minaya MT, et al. The development and validation of a new coeliac disease quality of life survey (CD-QOL). Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2010;31(6):666-675. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04220.x
    CrossRef
  14. Ware J, Kosinski M, Bjorner J, Turner-Bowker D, Gandek B, Maruish M. User’s manual for the SF36v2 Health Survey. Quality Metrics. Published online 2007.
  15. Dupuy H. The Psychological general Well-Being (PGWB) Index. In: Wenger N, Mattson M, Furberg C, Elinson J, eds. Assessment of Quality of Life in Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Therapies. Le Jacq Publishing; 1984:170-183.
  16. Kivelä L, Popp A, Arvola T, Huhtala H, Kaukinen K, Kurppa K. Long-term health and treatment outcomes in adult coeliac disease patients diagnosed by screening in childhood. United European Gastroenterology Journal. 2018;6(7):1022-1031. doi:10.1177/2050640618778386
    CrossRef
  17. Paarlahti P, Kurppa K, Ukkola A, et al. Predictors of persistent symptoms and reduced quality of life in treated coeliac disease patients: a large cross-sectional study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13(1):75. doi:10.1186/1471-230X-13-75
    CrossRef
  18. Paavola A, Kurppa K, Ukkola A, et al. Gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life in screen-detected celiac disease. Digestive and Liver Disease. 2012;44(10):814-818. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2012.04.019
    CrossRef
  19. Vilppula A, Kaukinen K, Luostarinen L, et al. Clinical benefit of gluten-free diet in screen-detected older celiac disease patients. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11(1):136. doi:10.1186/1471-230X-11-136
    CrossRef
  20. Ukkola A, Mäki M, Kurppa K, et al. Diet Improves Perception of Health and Well-being in Symptomatic, but Not Asymptomatic, Patients With Celiac Disease. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2011;9(2):118-123.e1. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2010.10.011
    CrossRef
  21. Kurppa K, Collin P, Sievänen H, Huhtala H, Mäki M, Kaukinen K. Gastrointestinal symptoms, quality of life and bone mineral density in mild enteropathic coeliac disease: A prospective clinical trial. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2010;45(3):305-314. doi:10.3109/00365520903555879
    CrossRef
  22. Roos S, Karner A, Hallert C. Psychological well-being of adult coeliac patients treated for 10 years. Digestive and Liver Disease. 2006;38(3):177-180. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2006.01.004
    CrossRef
  23. Viljamaa M, Collin P, Huhtala H, Sievanen H, Maki M, Kaukinen K. Is coeliac disease screening in risk groups justified? A fourteen-year follow-up with special focus on compliance and quality of life. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22(4):317-324. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02574.x
    CrossRef
  24. Nunes-Silva JG, Nunes VS, Schwartz RP, et al. Impact of type 1 diabetes mellitus and celiac disease on nutrition and quality of life. Nutr & Diabetes. 2017;7(1):e239-e239. doi:10.1038/nutd.2016.43
    CrossRef
  25. Tontini GE, Rondonotti E, Saladino V, Saibeni S, de Franchis R, Vecchi M. Impact of Gluten Withdrawal on Health-Related Quality of Life in Celiac Subjects: An Observational Case-Control Study. Digestion. 2010;82(4):221-228. doi:10.1159/000265549
    CrossRef
  26. Nachman F, del Campo MP, González A, et al. Long-term deterioration of quality of life in adult patients with celiac disease is associated with treatment noncompliance. Digestive and Liver Disease. 2010;42(10):685-691. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2010.03.004
    CrossRef
  27. Nachman F, Mauriño E, Vázquez H, et al. Quality of life in celiac disease patients. Digestive and Liver Disease. 2009;41(1):15-25. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2008.05.011
    CrossRef
  28. Usai P, Manca R, Cuomo R, Lai MA, Boi MF. Effect of gluten-free diet and co-morbidity of irritable bowel syndrome-type symptoms on health-related quality of life in adult coeliac patients. Digestive and Liver Disease. 2007;39(9):824-828. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2007.05.017
    CrossRef
  29. Hauser W, Gold J, Stein J, Caspary WF, Stallmach A. Health-related quality of life in adult coeliac disease in Germany: results of a national survey: European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2006;18(7):747-754. doi:10.1097/01.meg.0000221855.19201.e8
    CrossRef
  30. Johnston SD, Rodgers C, Watson RGp. Quality of life in screen-detected and typical coeliac disease and the effect of excluding dietary gluten: European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2004;16(12):1281-1286. doi:10.1097/00042737-200412000-00008
    CrossRef
  31. Fera T, Cascio B, Angelini G, Martini S, Guidetti C. Affective disorders and quality of life in adult coeliac disease patients on gluten-free diet. European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology. 2004;15:1287-1292. doi:10.1097/01.meg.0000085512.01212.c5
    CrossRef
  32. Usai P, Minerba L, Marini B, et al. Case control study on health-related quality of life in adult coeliac disease. Digestive and Liver Disease. 2002;34(8):547-552. doi:10.1016/S1590-8658(02)80087-1
    CrossRef
  33. Hopman EGD, Koopman HM, Wit JM, Mearin ML. Dietary compliance and health-related quality of life in patients with coeliac disease. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2009;21(9):1056-1061. doi:10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283267941
    CrossRef
  34. Choudhary S, Patel R, Pradhan D, Deval R, Singh H, Thomas G, Jain AK.
  35. Psoriasis and cardiovascular disorders: association or epiphenomenon? Meta-
  36. analysis of observational studies. 3 Biotech. 2020;10(3):104. doi:10.1007/s13205-020-2089-6. Epub 2020 Feb 7. PMID: 32099745; PMCID: PMC7007463
    CrossRef
  37. Choudhary S, Pradhan D, Pandey A, Khan MK, Lall R, Ramesh V, Puri P, Jain AK, Thomas G. The Association of Metabolic Syndrome and Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Study. Endocrine Metabolic & Immune Disorders – Drug Targets. 2020;20(5):703-717. doi: 10.2174/1871530319666191008170409. PMID: 31595859.
    CrossRef
  38. Bascuñán KA, Vespa MC, Araya M. Celiac disease: understanding the gluten-free diet. Eur J Nutr. 2017;56(2):449-459. doi:10.1007/s00394-016-1238-5
    CrossRef
  39. Lasa A, del Pilar Fernández-Gil M, Bustamante MÁ, Miranda J. Nutritional and Sensorial Aspects of Gluten-Free Products. In: Nutritional and Analytical Approaches of Gluten-Free Diet in Celiac Disease. Springer International Publishing; 2017:59-78. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53342-1_5
    CrossRef
  40. Padalino L, Mastromatteo M, Sepielli G, Nobile MAD. Formulation Optimization of Gluten-Free Functional Spaghetti Based on Maize Flour and Oat Bran Enriched in b-Glucans. Materials. 2011;4(12):2119-2135. doi:10.3390/ma4122119
    CrossRef
  41. Saturni L, Ferretti G, Bacchetti T. The Gluten-Free Diet: Safety and Nutritional Quality. Nutrients. 2010;2(1):16-34. doi:10.3390/nu2010016
    CrossRef

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.